Coronavirus made it tough but we keep working remotely with no delays. Get 15% OFF your First Order
Get 15% OFF your First Order

Argumentation and Advocacy GCU

COM 362 Full Course Discussions GCU

COM 362 Topic 1 DQ 1

Aristotle described argumentation as the following: “For to a certain extent all men attempt to discuss statements and to maintain them, to defend themselves, and to attack others.” Aristotle’s description of argumentation represents his view of how argumentation is a part of who we are as human beings. Do you agree or disagree with Aristotle’s viewpoint? Explain why. How has his viewpoint played a significant role in the historical development of argumentation?

COM 362 Topic 1 DQ 2

Find a blog that presents and defends an argument within one of its posts. Write a paragraph evaluating the arguments as either inductive or deductive. Provide the blog link in your paragraph response. Why do you think identifying these different elements in an argument is important?

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Argumentation and Advocacy GCU
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

COM 362 Topic 2 DQ 1

When watching or reading the news, what fallacies do you see people make most often in their arguments?

COM 362 Topic 2 DQ 2

Identify a fallacy you used in a recent discussion with another person. Why did you use that fallacy and how can you address the concern without the use of the fallacy?

COM 362 Topic 3 DQ 1

Find an example in society of a dispute that is (1) based on the ambiguity of language and (2) is not a genuine dispute. Point out the differences and propose how to resolve the dispute.

COM 362 Topic 3 DQ 2

Take a term that is related to a social issue you are personally interested in and clearly define it. For example, defining a right vs. a privilege in the debates on health care. Comment on another student’s post by seeing if you can find an exception that is excluded from the definition given.

COM 362 Topic 4 DQ 1

Examine an argument made in public and translate its conclusion to show one of the four standard-form categorical propositions (A, E, I, or O). Does the conclusion follow from the premises? Why or why not? Second, if its premises are true, what else can you infer about the conclusion? Analyze.

*Note: Remember that standard-form categorical propositions use affirmative or negative “to be” verbs (e.g., is, are, am, was, were, be, been, being) in its copula to set up a connection between two classes — the subject (S) and the predicate (P).

COM 362 Topic 4 DQ 2

As you are learning about propositions and contradictions, write out a view that you hold on a social issue in propositional form (A, E, I, or O). What is the logical contradiction to your view? Identify a specific group that advocates the contradiction of your viewpoint.

COM 362 Topic 5 DQ 1

Using an argument from an organization you found, create the logical contradiction for the organization’s position. Be sure to properly label the quality and quantity of the propositions.

COM 362 Topic 5 DQ 2

How would you communicate with someone who holds a different view than yourself in a way that is logically sound but does not deny the human dignity of the other person?

COM 362 Topic 6 DQ 1

Why is it important to understand how a syllogism functions when it comes to doing advocacy work?

COM 362 Topic 6 DQ 2

Provide an argument in affirmation of the topic; it is better to protect privacy over security. Your response should be at least 250 words long and include at least one source found using resources available from the school’s library or online.

COM 362 Topic 7 DQ 1

Research an argument in the realm of apologetics and evaluate the syllogism given (e.g., the transcended argument for the existence of God). Translate the argument into a standard-form categorical syllogism with a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion that contains a major term (predicate) and a minor term (subject). Make certain the major term, minor term, and middle term are connected by an affirmative or negative copula that uses “to be” verbs (e.g., is, are, am, was, were, be, been, being) in both premises and the conclusion.

COM 362 Topic 7 DQ 2

Find an argument against a position you hold. This can be in the realm of politics, religion, art, etc. Identify the form of the argument and state whether it is valid or invalid. Then, provide a response.

COM 362 Topic 8 DQ 1

When you are asked to construct an ethical argument, what do you consider that to mean? Explain and discuss with other whether there are objective or subjective standards for ethical arguments.

COM 362 Topic 8 DQ 2

Find an outside source that argues for some specific ethical standards in its argumentation. Translate it into a syllogism and evaluate its position. Comment on another student’s post.


COM 362 Full Course Assignments GCU

COM 362 Topic 1 Reading Exercise GCU

Complete the exercises in the attached document, “Reading Exercises.” These exercises are also in the textbook, refer to your text should you have questions or need further examples.COM362_T1_Reading_Exercises.docx

COM 362 Topic 2 Reading Exercise GCU

Complete the exercises in the attached document, “Reading Exercises.” These exercises are also in the textbook, refer to your text should you have questions or need further examples.COM362_T2_Reading Exercises.docx


COM 362 Topic 2 Social Fallacies GCU


Specialists in communication are often hired to clean up problems created by unthoughtful messaging. While advocates dedicate significant amounts of time and energy promoting causes, they often struggle to clearly identify their logical positions. To further the problem, in light of clear arguments advocates commonly utilize informal fallacies to persuade their target audiences. These weaknesses tend to create easily avoidable communications crises. The first step is to identify the communicative problems.

For this assignment, identify a social issue you are personally interested in learning more about, advocating for the cause, or are against it, and identify fallacious reasoning.

In 750-1,000words:

  1. Research an advocate (individual or organization) that promotes a relevant social issue. Identify the organization and explain the relevancy of the social issue.
  2. Show the steps you took to translate the position/argument you researched into a clear logical form by writing out the logical premises and conclusions from the material presented by the advocate.
  3. Identify a minimum of five informal fallacies that are made by the advocate. Explain the fallacies themselves and how each functions.

At least two academic peer-reviewed sources are required for this paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.