Coronavirus made it tough but we keep working remotely with no delays. Get 15% OFF your First Order
Get 15% OFF your First Order

PSYC 4467 Idaho State University Psychology of Aging Discussion

PSYC 4467-02: ST: Psychology of Aging Assignment 2 – Interview with older adult (30% of grade) What is the assignment? This is a written assignment that should be 5-6 pages in length, double spaced.

Upload your assignment as a Word document to Moodle by the due date. The purpose is to answer the essay prompt below. Interview an older adult (65yrs +) whom you believe is aging successfully. Pick two course topics about which to base your interview questions.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
PSYC 4467 Idaho State University Psychology of Aging Discussion
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Support your answer with material from the textbook, mini lectures and /or required readings as well as your interview material. You can read more widely if you wish, but you do not have to. Essay prompt: Describe two topics from the course that are necessary for successful aging.

Based on what you’ve learned from your interviewee, which perspective (topic) is most critical to successful aging? Explain the reasons you have come to this conclusion. Whom should I interview? Grandparents are a great option, or older individuals that are friends of the family.

Neighbors or perhaps a colleague. It really can be anyone 65+ years, but it is very important that you obtain verbal consent from the interviewee and explain that this is for a class assignment. What questions should I ask in my interview? Below you will find some example questions from a few course topics that you may want to ask your interviewee, but they are limited. You should design your own interview questions.

Aim for at least 6-7 questions per topic. Example of how to begin your interview: “I am interviewing you because I think you are someone who is aging successfully. I am going to ask you to tell me how you feel you are aging in different aspects of your life and I would like you to tell me what you do (and don’t do) that has helped you age successfully”. Example questions: With respect to physical health –

1. Do you feel that you are aging successfully in the physical domain?

2. What do you do (or avoid) that helps you to maintain your physical health? 3. How do you adapt to any changes in the physical environment? With respect to personality –

4. How do you feel that your personality contributes to you aging successfully?

5. What do you consider are the most important personality traits in later life? Why?

6. What are the greatest challenges that you face with other personalities and how do you overcome them? Has this changed with age? With respect to social life –

7. Do you feel that you are aging successfully socially?

8. What do you do (or avoid) that helps you to maintain your social relationships and community involvement? PSYC 4467-02: ST: Psychology of Aging Assignment 2 – Interview with older adult (30% of grade)

9. Is it more or less important to have social interactions in later life? Why / why not? General –

10. Is there anything that I missed that you think contributes to your successful aging?

Grading rubric: See below.

This assignment is worth 30% of your grade and is made up of 40 possible points. You will be assessed on four sections each worth 10 points: content / addressing the prompt, organization, writing style and creativity. Read each section of the rubric carefully before beginning, to make sure you score the highest mark possible. 0-2pts Content / addressing the prompt Lacks depth of interview. Less than two perspectives addressed with very little grasp of the information.

Misunderstanding of content. 3-4 pts 7-8 pts 9-10 pts Has rudimentary Demonstrates information of the Good discussion of the Satisfactory discussion exemplary depth of interview but lacks interview and of the of the interview, interview with relevant depth of ideas presented. and well-thought out however fails to fully understanding.

Less Shows depth of evaluate both elaboration. Both than two perspectives understanding of both perspectives. perspectives fully addressed, some perspectives. discussed. misunderstandings. Organization Demonstrates Somewhat organized, disorganized structure. student jumps around Reader cannot follow and difficult to follow / sequence of read in parts information. Writing style Tone is colloquial.

Numerous spelling, punctuation, grammatical errors. Page count within limits or > 2 pages off Creativity 5-6 pts Tone often colloquial. Several spelling, punctuation, grammatical errors. Page count within limits or between 1-2 pages off Satisfactory structure. Presents information in Good organization, Confusing sequence in a logical sequence logical sequence that parts which interrupts which is mostly well can be followed. Very the flow, but essay can structured.

Generally well structured be followed. easy to follow Varied tone. Some spelling, punctuation, grammatical errors. Page count within limits or > 1 page off Does not gain nor hold Generally lacking in Engages the reader in the reader’s interest, drawing the reader in, places but lackluster writer uninterested in topic seems trivial at writing in others. topic. Repetitive and times.

Dull and Satisfactory word confusing word choice. uninspired word choice. Shows some Displays an absence choice. Lacks creativity in parts of creativity creativity Mostly formal tone. Few spelling, punctuation, grammatical errors.

Page count within limits Formal tone. No spelling, punctuation, grammatical errors. Page count within limits Gets reader’s Captures reader’s attention, possesses a attention, succeeds in quality that maintains getting the reader to the reader’s interest in care about this topic. the topic. Mostly Striking, natural and interesting and varied word choice. engaging word choice. Displays exemplary creativity Shows much creativity